Sunday, 20 June 2010 22:25

Disc Arthroplasty (Disc Replacement Surgery), Low Back Pain and the Efficacy of Post-Surgical Chiropractic Care

Written by 
Rate this item
(2 votes)

Disc Arthroplasty (Disc Replacement Surgery),  Low Back Pain and the Efficacy of Post-Surgical Chiropractic Care

A report on the scientific literature 



By
Mark Studin DC, FASBE (C), DAAPM, DAAMLP
William J. Owens DC, DAAMLP

 

Here are the facts:[1]


  1. One-half of all working Americans admit to having back pain symptoms each year
  2. Back pain is one of the most common reasons for missed work. In fact, back pain is the second most common reason for visits to the doctor's office, outnumbered only by upper-respiratory infections.
  3. Most cases of back pain are mechanical or non-organic-meaning they are not caused by serious conditions, such as inflammatory arthritis, infection, fracture or cancer.
  4. Americans spend at least $50 Billion each year on back pain-and that's just for the more easily identified costs.
  5. Experts estimate that as many as 80% of the population will experience a back problem at some time in our lives

 
When conservative therapies for low back pain (LBP) are not effective, elective surgery may be proposed to these patients. In the United States, it has been estimated that between 6 and 7.5% of chronic LBP patients undergo spinal surgery. The main reasons for surgical treatment of
LBP are high levels of pain, disability and underlying pathology. Patients with disc degeneration represent a large part of spinal surgerypractice. Over the last 20 years, a new technology, disc replacement, has become increasingly popular because it is believed to maintain or restore the integrity of spinal movement and minimize the side-effects compared to fusion. Although disc replacement may relieve a patient from pain and related disability, soreness and stiffness of the lumbo-pelvic region seem to be common aftermaths of the surgery.[2]

 
While this type of surgery, or the necessity for surgery is not the topic of this article, the authors feel strongly that the decision for spinal surgery, predominantly an elective procedure should be made via a team approach. The patient must (not should) consult both the non-surgical health care provider as well as the surgical provider and those specialist must have a level of dialogue to reach a consensus of the best course of care weighing all of the risks vs. benefits with the patient. No one provider has all of the answers.
 
Spinal manipulation (adjustments) is one of the recommended conservative therapies for low back pain. Usually, adverse events occur in the first 24 to 48 hours, are benign and resolve completely in a few days. Major complications, for which the overall prevalence is unknown, include increased pain from disc herniation (transient) or cauda equina syndrome (estimated to be less than 1/ 3,700,000 to 1/1,000,000 of lumbar manipulations) and are considered irreversible. Since disc prostheses are believed to restore normal segmental range of motion and reduce potential residual instability, patients with total disc replacement could probably be manipulated similarly to patients with specific low back pain by standard side posture spinal manipulation to alleviate residual pain.[3]

 
After disc replacement, patients with residual, chronic low back pain would present spinal manipulation side-effects similar to those generally described in a chronic low back pain population.
 
The main objective of a 2010 study was to evaluate the potential adverse events of lumbar spine manipulations in disc replacement surgery patients. The most frequent side-effects reported were a slight increase in pain as well as minor to moderate lower back stiffness. Both side effects are frequently seen in non-surgical LBP patients after manipulation. In a recent study, Rubinstein described post-spinal manipulation adverse events as being mild to moderate in intensity, with little or no influence on daily activities. He also showed that such events are brief, with spontaneous recovery and typically lasting no more than a few days.[4]

 
In the same article, it was mentioned that adverse events usually appear at the first treatment and are the result of muscles accommodating to the correct positioning of the spine and need a day or so to “calm down.”
 
In a recent systematic review of safety of chiropractic intervention, the frequency of adverse events reported after a chiropractic intervention varied between 33 to 60.9%, regardless of treatment type and the patients' clinical presentation and again, is a minor to moderate stiffness and resolves in a very short time spontaneously. Regarding severe adverse reactions; in the present study, none of the patients had severe and irreversible reactions after spinal manipulation.
 
These studies along with many others conclude that a drug-free approach of chiropractic care is one of the best solutions for patients with post surgical low back pain. To find a qualified doctor of chiropractic near you go to the US Chiropractic Directory at www.USChiroDirectory.com
an search your state.


[1]http://www.spineuniverse.com/conditions/back-pain/low-back-pain/chiropractic-treatment-back-pain-facts-statistics
[2]O'Shaughnessy et al., Chiropractic management of patients post-disc arthroplasty: eight case reports Chiropractic & Osteopathy
2010, 18:7
[3]O'Shaughnessy et al., Chiropractic management of patients post-disc arthroplasty: eight case reports Chiropractic & Osteopathy
2010, 18:7
 
[4]O'Shaughnessy et al., Chiropractic management of patients post-disc arthroplasty: eight case reports Chiropractic & Osteopathy
2010, 18:7
 

Share this

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google BookmarksSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn
Read 116667 times Last modified on Thursday, 26 May 2016 02:45

Media

Share this

Submit to DeliciousSubmit to DiggSubmit to FacebookSubmit to Google BookmarksSubmit to StumbleuponSubmit to TechnoratiSubmit to TwitterSubmit to LinkedIn

More Research